Pianophilia

Francesco Durante: Divertimento
A little piece by Durante, nice to play.
Greetings, kroket

Hi. In a stack of scores belonging to a friend of mine I found a work by a quite obscure composer, Renzo Rossellini. The work is "Quattro Poemetti Pagani" written in 1936.
I promptly scanned the file -not very HQ but finely readable- and, if copyright permits me (I don't know the composer) I would be more than happy to share it here.
Let me know if I can post the file

Renzo Rossellini (2 February 1908 – 13 May 1982). Here's a very brief bio:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renzo_Rossellini_(composer%29

Aprosdoketon wrote:Hi. In a stack of scores belonging to a friend of mine I found a work by a quite obscure composer, Renzo Rossellini. The work is "Quattro Poemetti Pagani" written in 1936.
I promptly scanned the file -not very HQ but finely readable- and, if copyright permits me (I don't know the composer) I would be more than happy to share it here.
Let me know if I can post the file

Aprosdoketon

Owing to the obscurity of the composer (completely new to me and I suspect may be out of print) - I am happy for you to post.

Malcolm

Ok!
Scanned by a noob without equipment (low quality and big size), but I printed a couple of pages and are readable without any problems.

Thank you Aprosdoketon... this is a wonderful and rare find. Lovely set of impressionist poems, well conceived and with the prestigious Ricordi imprint! Thanks for sharing this very interesing score with us all.

Aprosdoketon wrote:Ok!
Scanned by a noob without equipment (low quality and big size), but I printed a couple of pages and are readable without any problems.

Nice set of pieces--thanks for the upload. I particulary like the third, 'Ninfa.'

My typesetting (made in Musescore) of a Sonata by
SANTE LAPIS (Santo? 1699/1765)
based on an old edition in IMSLP.
I plan to complete the set in the spare time. Any feedback in improving the layout is more than welcome!

Aprosdoketon wrote:Any feedback in improving the layout is more than welcome!

A couple of small observations - hope you don't mind:-
1. It is very clear to read, although the IMSLP original is also fairly clear.
2. Is the bar-numbering correct? I thought that, by convention, only metrically
complete bars are meant to be numbered. (I'd have omitted the bar-numbering
completely, to avoid possible confusion.)

Timtin wrote:

Aprosdoketon wrote:Any feedback in improving the layout is more than welcome!

2. Is the bar-numbering correct? I thought that, by convention, only metrically
complete bars are meant to be numbered.

You're right! I have forgotten to eliminate the anacrusis from the count.