Page 7 of 10

### Re: More than 2 hands (but NOT 4) on any number of pianos

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:26 am
Wunderbar! Thanks Fred!
M.

### Re: More than 2 hands (but NOT 4) on any number of pianos

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:57 am
Mouchette wrote:Wunderbar! Thanks Fred!
M.
You have 8 hands???

Regards
Puzzled

### Re: More than 2 hands (but NOT 4) on any number of pianos

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:09 am
fredbucket wrote:
Mouchette wrote:Wunderbar! Thanks Fred!
M.
You have 8 hands???

Regards
Puzzled
If necessary.

### Re: More than 2 hands (but NOT 4) on any number of pianos

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:20 pm
Another puzzle - 'More than 2 hands (but not 4) on any number of pianos'.
Does this mean 3, 5, 6, 7, 8,... hands on 0, 1, 2, 3, 4,... pianos? It seems
to me that there infinitely many logically impossible combinations produced,
if the number of hands is less than the number of pianos. The possibility of
fractional, negative, or, God forbid, imaginary numbers of pianos has also
not been ruled out, worryingly.

### Re: More than 2 hands (but NOT 4) on any number of pianos

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 10:48 pm
Timtin wrote:Another puzzle - 'More than 2 hands (but not 4) on any number of pianos'.
The most common multiplayer combinations are 1P4H (duet) (viewtopic.php?f=11&t=83) and 2P4H (viewtopic.php?f=11&t=84). This thread captures all other combinations.

Regards
Fred

### Re: More than 2 hands (but NOT 4) on any number of pianos

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 10:12 am
Timtin wrote:Another puzzle - 'More than 2 hands (but not 4) on any number of pianos'.
Does this mean 3, 5, 6, 7, 8,... hands on 0, 1, 2, 3, 4,... pianos? It seems
to me that there infinitely many logically impossible combinations produced,
if the number of hands is less than the number of pianos. The possibility of
fractional, negative, or, God forbid, imaginary numbers of pianos has also
not been ruled out, worryingly.
In fact, I myself prefer 1 - exp(πi) pianos...
paolor

### Re: More than 2 hands (but NOT 4) on any number of pianos

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 3:55 pm
I'm more of a 2 + exp(πi) piano man!

### Re: More than 2 hands (but NOT 4) on any number of pianos

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:00 pm
Timtin wrote:I'm more of a 2 + exp(πi) piano man!
$2 + exp(πi + 2πk), k\in mathbb{Z}$
There's a whole new world out there when k>0

### Re: More than 2 hands (but NOT 4) on any number of pianos

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:21 pm
It's real fun to play these pieces - one doesn't need to be inséparable, but certainly one shouldn't be intouchable...
Br, paolor
Schultze Les 3 Inséparables Vol.1 6H.pdf

### Re: More than 2 hands (but NOT 4) on any number of pianos

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 6:29 pm
paolor wrote:It's real fun to play these pieces - one doesn't need to be inséparable, but certainly one shouldn't be intouchable...
Br, paolor
Excellent, dear Paolor, thanks a lot!
(But don't forget that vol. 1 and vol. 2 ARE inseparable... )

M.